This Shit Matters

South Staffordshire: Wombourne North ward · by topic

Money and cost of living

Every candidate's published position on this one topic, side by side, in ballot-paper order.

All five topics side by side

Describe a household to see only what applies to it. Optional.Open
0 of 7 chosen
Age
Adults in the household
Children or dependants
Housing
Household income before tax, per year
Work
Studying
Optional: a few more things some policies refer to. Leave blank and nothing is assumed.
Anyone in the household is disabled or has a long-term health condition
Anyone in the household is an unpaid carer
Anyone in the household is on a UK visa, or seeking asylum
The household receives any means-tested benefit (Universal Credit, Pension Credit, etc.)
The household owns or regularly drives a car
Anyone in the household has served in the armed forces
Bands only. Nothing is saved.

  1. 1Michael James JonesLiberal Democrats

    No published position found.

  2. 2Elizabeth Beatrice Florence KeelingThe Conservative and Unionist Party

    No published position found.

  3. 3Claire McIlvennaGreen Party candidate

    No published position found.

  4. 4Marie ShortlandReform UK

    No published position found.

  5. 5Anil SinghLabour and Co-operative Party

    Candidate statement · Anil Singh (candidate), via Democracy Club · Statement to voters: Anil Singh

    With very high levels of council tax, huge savings cound be generated by using systems thinking approaches by bringing the pothole fixing team in-house, devolving it to our District Council would create a more responsive service and end the cycle of botched repairs.

    In short: Says local businesses should take priority for council contracts, and that bringing pothole repairs in-house and devolving them to the district council would save money and end botched repairs.

Each position is quoted exactly from its source; the line beneath is a reading aid, not the record. Back to all candidates.

Go deeper on money and cost of living: independent sources

None of these is affiliated with a party. Where a source campaigns for a position, the label says so. Links open the original site.

Cross-cutting: polling, fact-checking, parliamentary research